
There is a widespread assumption that ideal welfare
conditions can only be created for ducks if a source of open water
is available, but new research shows this is not the
case.
In an on-farm trial, it was clear that of all water supplies
available to ducks – whether it's via a trough, pond, shower or
nipple drinker – birds overwhelmingly preferred spending time under
the shower.
Although there is no looming regulatory need to offer extra
water supplies to farmed ducks, producers – backed by the
British Poultry Council –
have supported the research, which also included detailed scoring
of the birds on test to assess various aspects of their physical
condition while alive and after slaughter.
The
DEFRA-funded research was undertaken by Marian Dawkins and
Tracey Jones of Oxford
University, and they have been awarded a £1000 scholarship by
the British Poultry Council.
They showed that ducks provided with showers spent over twice as
much time using this facility for resting compared with those in
housing offering water via a bath, trough or nipple drinker. They
also drank almost a third more water in accommodation provided with
showers.
Surprisingly, the research showed that there was little swimming
activity among birds provided with a bath in the rearing
environment, which the scientists described as showing "little
importance" to the ducks compared with their preference for using
the showers.
"The purpose of the trial was to assess the behavioural reaction
to ducks when given access to a range of different sources of water
in which to bathe. Commercial producers were fully supportive of
the trial, but recognised that providing clean supplies of water
for large numbers of commercially reared ducks – and keeping that
water and the area around it clean – isn't easy," said Prof
Dawkins.
Providing the most favoured source of water hygienically in
commercial units will be the ultimate outcome of this trial.
The researchers acknowledged that as well as providing nipple
drinkers to commercially-reared ducks as the most "hygienic" way of
supplying water, ducks also needed water offered in a way that
enabled the birds to keep their eyes healthy, usually achieved in
the natural state by ducks immersing their heads while
swimming.
Two batches of 60
Cherry Valley Pekin
strain ducks were used in the trial. All pens were supplied with
nipple drinkers at all times. Various water resources were also
provided.
Key findings Ducks spend more time under a shower than in any
other water provided Birds with access to showers had fewer eye
problems Further research is looking at how often showers
are required |
|---|
Ducks were offered a bath enabling full-body emersion throughout
the entire rearing period; a trough to allow head dipping
throughout the full rearing period; nipple drinkers for the first
35 days followed by additional access to bathing; nipple drinkers
only with no access to bathing at any stage; and a shower system
accessible throughout the full rearing period.
"Ducks made it very clear – they love to shower," said Prof
Dawkins. "They used the showers far more than any other source of
water we provided. Now further research will have to be undertaken
to study their behaviour more closely in terms of how often
showering facilities are required. We have now acquired a
commercial partner to look more fully at the impact of bathing
resources on the birds' health and welfare.
"Part of our future work will need to evaluate how often ducks
use showers. Is it something they use regularly and individually
throughout the day or something they use en-masse for short
periods? These considerations are very important as commercial
producers look at ways of providing an effective and clean water
resource to enhance duck welfare."
Although there was no marked difference in growth rates of ducks
on systems offering varying sources of water, over half the birds
moved into the treatment pens at 21 days after not having had
access to showers or head emersion facilities, showed crusted eyes.
All these affected birds had overcome their eye problems within 16
days of having access to showers or troughs.
Peter Bradnock of the British Poultry Council said the research
would lead to enhanced welfare for commercially-reared ducks
removing the emotive issues associated with farmed ducks and
water.
"Ducks need water for cleaning and preening and this is the
first step in how the most effective source of water can be
supplied. Further research is already under way as ways of
delivering these findings to current commercial systems is
assessed."
Project at a glance |
|---|
Timescale October 2004-September 2007 Who conducted it Marian Dawkins and Tracey
Jones Funder DEFRA The problem Although there is an unproven
assumption that ideal welfare conditions could only be created for
ducks if a source of open water was available, this research sought
to evaluate the preferred option when ducks were given water from a
trough, bath, nipple drinker or
shower. |