
A period of sustained loss between 2004 and 2008 has led
to insufficient investment in rearing facilities, according
toa reportcommissioned by the NFU and
UK broiler growers.
The cost of investing in new poultry sites has more than doubled
in the past 10 years with estimates of building costs ranging from
£172 to £182/sq m for a greenfield poultry unit. And as poultry
units don't have an alternative use, any rental value only relates
to rearing broilers.
Key points - Average flock sizes have doubled over the past 10 years
- UK self sufficiency in poultry meat has declined from a high of
about 97% in the late 1980s
- Producer values of poultry meat have declined from a peak of
£1.34bn in 2003 to £1.22bn in
2007
|
|---|
The report says: "It is reasonable to consider the investment as
relatively high risk and, as such, should attract a budgeted return
of 10-20%."
Looking at survey data covering summer 2008, it shows that even
when accepting a return on investment of just 6%, a new unit would
fail to generate a profit (see table). This means any commercially
minded producer is unlikely to invest.
One fear is that the industry will shrink and lose critical
mass, as highlighted by
NFU poultry board
chairman Charles Bourns. He points to the issue of food security
with the world population set to increase, fuelling demand for
chicken. "We can import from overseas to plug the shortfall in
production. But is this going to be possible in 10-15 years time
with the predicted increase in global population?
"If we want to keep the industry at home, investment is
necessary. A lot of sheds were built in the 1970s, which will soon
need replacing."
His fear is backed by
DEFRA
figures, which show that UK poultry meat production is at its
lowest level since 1995, with the rolling six-month average down to
120,000 tonnes a month from a peak of 135,000.
NFU data obtained by the authors suggests the average producer
has been reporting a loss from when NFU analysis started in
December 2004 up to October 2008 with the losses peaking at
6.65p/kg in December 2007. Feed costs are the biggest variable,
ranging from 28.03 to 45.64p/kg. Energy and water costs have also
increased significantly.
Producer margins are not helped by retailers' high margin
expectations. NFU chief poultry advisor Rob Newbery says the
multiples expect about 30% margins on large volumes of sales, which
makes chicken important to business. At the end of last year,
producers were receiving 68.2p/kg, while the wholesale price was
126p/kg and the retail price of 279p/kg. This means that producers
receive only a quarter of available margin compared with the
retailer share of about 50%.
To address concerns over the sustainability of British chicken,
the report has come up with a series of recommendations. First, it
calls for a new approach to contracts between growers, integrators
and retailers, as reinvestment in buildings require confidence in
long-term relationships. Confidence is lacking where contracts can
be terminated (by both parties) with as little as two crops notice,
whereas any investment in buildings requires a 10-year write-off
period.
For those contracts between integrators and growers, the report
suggests a set of proposals, including a guaranteed payment per
unit area of space made available. This should reflect the capital
cost of the building and be revised annually for any new builds.
While this payment provides the grower no profit, it underwrites
some of the risk. However, the grower is still exposed if the
contract is terminated.
Energy costs have been changing rapidly recently and growers'
payments should reflect this change on a monthly basis.
Mr Bourns also believes there should be more emphasis on
quality. "Producers should be paid more for better quality birds.
Young farmers need an incentive, as someone producing poorer birds
are paid the same."
A second recommendation is that the industry should introduce an
independent costing service overseen by a trusted third party to
enable informed decision making.
There is some understanding of average costs, but too little
understanding of how these costs vary between producers and the
potential to improve efficiency. While confidentiality may be an
issue for some growers, one way around this is to use an
independent firm to undertake the costings, reporting on a unit
area basis. Or it could be in the form of benchmarking clubs,
suggests Mr Bourns.
"Benchmarking is a good idea as many producers do not know
enough about costs and whether their figures are good or bad. For
example, there can be a discrepancy in costs such as shavings and
sharing this would be of great use."
Finally, the report suggests looking into partnership
arrangements between groups of growers and retailers, similar to
milk producer groups operated by individual retailers. This will
not only helps growers secure long-term relationships, it can also
benefit others in the chain by providing the retailer with
marketing edge and reinforcing the commitment between integrator
and grower to the supplier.
Impact of investing in a new
shed |
| | p/sq
m/week |
Gross margin | 85 |
Total operating cost | 55.35 |
Cost of shed | 38.85 |
Interest on capital @ 6% | 0.22 |
Net margin | 9.43 loss |
* Cost of new shed
deducted from actual growers' results for 2008 | |
Case study: Kinsey Hern, Herefordshire
Herefordshire broiler grower Kinsey Hern, who hopes to expand to
160,000 birds by the end of the year, believes the key message from
the report is the need for better communication links between
retailers and producers to enable more efficient responses to the
effects of increased growing costs and legislation on UK farms.
"Liveweight prices for British chicken do not leave enough
finance to cover investment in broiler chicken production over a
10-year period. Only substantial incentives above the market price
make investment viable, which have recently surfaced because of
grower awareness that investment was not possible at the current
price. The incentive (which also falsely affects supply-and-demand
dynamics, and undermines the viability of current broiler
production space) does not go far enough in relation to the risk of
investment.
"Questions might be raised as to why we are expanding when the
figures do not stack up. It will enable us to be more competitive
as British chicken producers than we are now, by spreading our
fixed costs even thinner, with the hope that the market will
improve to make our investment worthwhile.
"Alongside the NFU, I am carrying out a shed age survey across
the country. This will hopefully be used as a tool to highlight how
little investment has been made in the broiler industry lately, and
create an understanding in the supply chain that more money needs
to be filtered through to the British broiler grower.
"We have 81 farms and I would like to urge all growers to take
part by sending their farm name, along with date and size of sheds
built."
All farm data will remain confidential, for more details email
kjhern@hotmail.com