« Statement on foot and mouth from the Pride family | Main | Foot and mouth - Farmers Weekly policy »

Is the foot and mouth coverage too sensationalist?

Farmers have been saying for some days that there is no need for the media to keep showing 2001 pictures of burning pyres and dead animals being loaded into lorries.

So it's interesting to see Andrew Grant-Adamson saying much the same on his blog.

On the evidence so far, the Government has learned from the disaster of the 2001 outbreak of foot and mouth disease but the media have not. TV reports — the story missed the early editions of the papers that we get in this part of the country — are played out against wallpaper of of the Stygian images of flames and smoke from pyres and carcasses suspended from cranes.

It is like deciding the pictures from a current war are not dramatic enough so we are using some from an earlier one.

In a interlude from this wallpaper in an ITN report we get a brief shot of the the chief vet who says there will be "no pyres, no burning of carcasses". Then it is back to film of pyres and their preparation. It is much the same on other channels.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.fwi.co.uk/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/9907

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on August 7, 2007 3:05 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Statement on foot and mouth from the Pride family.

The next post in this blog is Foot and mouth - Farmers Weekly policy.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.