I have just been chatting with Wayne in the office. He is doing a sponsored walk of 60 miles for Guide Dogs for the Blind.
There are very few bad charities and I'm certainly not suggesting that GD 4 the B is a bad charity - it's just not the one that I would think of first. Being the ignorant and unpleasant person that I am, I pointed this out to Wayne.
"Ah, but what could be worse than losing your sight, Mr Matthew?" he said with a degree of poignancy (He does ACTUALLY call me Mr Matthew - he's from South Africa).
I was writing my next article for the magazine when he came in. I looked at the computer screen and realised that I wouldn't be able to write them if I couldn't see.
OK I could be like Dame Barbara Cartland (deceased) and lay on a chaise longue (I already have one) stroking my peek (or pekingese to you) and dictating to a secretary who could recite things back to me while a good-looking assistant applied more white emulsion to my wrinkly old face. Hang on, I'll put you up a picture of deceased Dame Gorgeous herself.

So I said "Maybe you are right, Wayne." Then I thought, no he bloomin' isn't. A guide dog can't do shorthand. A guide dog can't explain the hilarious visual comedy of "Some Mothers Do Have Them." (Irony - I bloomin' hate "Some Mothers Do Have Them.") I seem to remember that years ago there was a guide dog on Blue Peter that could make a cup of tea but this could be my mind playing tricks on me.
I said that I prized hearing over sight which is quite an irony since I never listen to anything anyone says. I like listening to the radio but then I like reading books and watching French films with subtitles (I've told you I'm a ponce already, so it's no good getting annoyed about it now).
Then I realised that it would be an interesting decision for a blind person to travel to India to listen to the Taj Mahal. Would that be worth listening to the sound of your own dysentery for a week? Let's take a look at a picture of Taj (as I call it) from a view that we don't normally see.

So on reflection I put sight ahead of hearing. "But what about touch, Wayne?" I asked. Oh no. He wanted sight before touch. "But Wayne, you'd be able to look but not touch. Wouldn't that bother you?" He said that he wanted to look at what he was touching. As a single man living in Lincolnshire, I wondered if the reverse wasn't preferable. Wayne is married which probably affected his decision on that one.
Smell would certainly be the one that you would be prepared to lose first in a card game. OK its nice to smell the flowers but there are more bad smells that good smells. Taste is pretty important but we could let that one go next. Then touch, hearing and sight. We were both agreed. That was the order of importance.
It was quite good to be thinking about senses just at the start of the weekend (even though I'm working for some of it). I am going to now go and smell the fresh air, cut the lawns and then taste my first glass of Pimms for 2008.
I'll write a bit more about farming next week, I promise. It's been a busy week but I can't tell you about it.
Have a good and sensual weekend











Recent Comments