Cookies & Privacy
Funny old week - Jane King's blog

Jane King's blog

Farmers Weekly's editor gives you an insight into how FW group works...
Funny old week

It's been a funny old week..... firstly getting back into the swing of things after 2 Christmas weeks of laying on a sofa eating chocolate and then all the media furore over tv programmes about chickens and farming.   It's certainly kept the team on their toes. There's been no less than 9 tv programmes, endless hours of radio debate and pages and pages in print about Hugh's Chicken Run, Kill It, Cook It, Eat It and Jamie's Fowl Dinners. 

We've been really perked up and impressed by the courage of the farmers who have gone out of their way to go on air and show the masses what they do.    But we've also been frustrated by the cautiousness of the poultry industry and retailers.  If we've got nothing to hide, why be so wary about coming forward?  Changing public perceptions will be a big challenge and we really must start making the most of these opportunities and tackling the scrutiny and criticism head on.   

Readers were certainly not wary of coming forward when answering the last www.fwi.co.uk poll on how they rated DEFRA's performance.  We had one of our biggest ever turnouts for this one (some 2508 votes) and, surprise surprise, no less than 93% of them rated DEFRA as "rubbish".   Not the most deep and meaningful surveys we've ever done but it made a lot of people feel better to get it off their chest!         

Published 11 January 2008 15:46 by Jane King | [Edit Post]

Comments

# re: Funny old week@ 13 January 2008 11:56

Good start to the blog Jane, will read the coming weeks with interest.

The media interest that Channel 4's Big Food Fight has created is a golden oppertunity to interact with consumers who are often thinking about how their food is produced for the first time.

In your opinion, how does the industry capitalise on this new wave of media interest, and what part can FW play to add industry knowledge to balance the opinions of the urban consumer?

[Remove this Comment]

2595154