Ahhhhh, yet again we see that you are failing to give us all the relevent information, and embelishing your story in order to increase the contoversey value of your latest fwi offering.
Define "Dead, rotting animal"? If it is dead then it is also, by definition, rotting. The rotting process starts from the moment life ceases. This basic principle can be applied to everything from grass to sheep. So the beast may have only been shuffled off this mortal coil for a few short hours. And why shopuldn't the hounds be fed on this meat that would otherwise be waisted? Dogs will happily scavenge in the wild, so it wouldn't be unnatural for them to have a nibble of the carcase no matter how long it has been dead.
This is all fairly academic of course. as the kennelman may be employed as a knacker man, it is his job to remove a corpse regardless of its stage of decomposition, the same as any other kind of knacker man. If it is not fit for the hounds to consume then it is his repsonsibility to dispose of it accordingly and not the responsibility farmer you seem so keen to... disagree with!
So why is this not right or legal please? Perhaps you would be so good as to explain the correct legal interpretation from your own extensive experience?
Fine dogs by the way. Dobermen are they?
"Dogs look up to us, cats look down on us, but pigs treat us as equals." (Sir Winston Churchill)