Cookies & Privacy
in

LEAF and Integrated Farming

Last post Mon, May 16 2005 14:05 by anonymous. 11 replies.
Page 1 of 1 (12 items)
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • Mon, May 16 2005 14:05

    LEAF and Integrated Farming

    I am investigating the benefits or otherwise of joining LEAF and would be interested in people's experiences. Is it what we are already doing or are there added benefits? Are there any disadvantages? Thanks
  • Mon, May 16 2005 19:51

    LEAF and Integrated Farming

    Devon, I have been a LEAF member since it's inception in the early 90s. I am now LEAF Communications Committee chairman. So I have an interest here but my involvement with LEAF gives me no direct pecuniary reward. I am a LEAF enthusiast and activist because I beleive it makes the case for british agriculture as a caring, clean and responsible industry better than any other organsiation that represents british agriculture. I think this is important because we need to constantly make our case when it comes the consumer, the regulator and the tax payer. Our lives and wallets will fare much better with these groups on our side. On a more practical basis. In some instances LEAF marque accreditation will secure you markets that pay a premium. Doing a LEAF audit will gain you points under ELS. The downside? It will cost you around £100 a year (depending on size) to join. If you do join you will be joining a growing organisation that has constantly been ahead of the game. Here endeth the lecture. For more information ring LEAF If you will permit me I will paste an article into here about a project LEAF are rolling out this very week . I am very proud of it. Guy Smith All on board In the main part the British countryside is not a natural landscape. You have to go back several thousand years to find it in it’s natural wooded state. Today the architecture that fashions our countryside is provided by farmers. The hedges, the ponds, the tracks, the copses, the barns, the ditches, the walls, the pastures, the crops: - all put their by farmers for the purpose of farm production. The British countryside is one of the most beautiful and bio-diverse landscapes in the world but it is a worked landscape, a managed landscape. Sometimes landscapes are too easily taken for granted. To the casual observer it is easy to overlook the work of the farmer. It is easy to assume farmland features are in some way natural. Thereby the work of the farmer is unseen. The importance of explaining the role of the farmer in managing the countryside has never been more important. In the era of decoupled CAP payments one of the central justifications is the delivery of environmental goods. There is also an increasing need to explain what is going on in the countryside to the increasing number of the public who use it for their recreation. Another issue farmers are concerned about is one of managing access. Because of Cross Compliance and ELS requirements, field margins will increasingly be uncultivated or unfarmed. This may well lead to confusion in the minds of the public that there is now some sort of access along field headlands. What is needed is information boards that politely explain that these margins are for the benefit of wildlife which can be compromised if they are walked upon. Respect for private farm land is diminishing in modern Britain but respect for things like rare orchids or ground nesting birds is increasing. Farmers would do well to move with the times. “Trespassers will be prosecuted” is yesterday’s language. “Area designated for wildlife only. Please keep out” is probably a far more powerful message. If you wander around nature reserves you will frequently come across well made, attractive boards. These boards have three functions. Firstly they explain the immediate environment to the visitor so that they better understand what is going on around them. Secondly they guide the visitor so that they do not wander into those areas where wildlife is compromised by their presence. Finally they promote the work of those who manage the reserve so that their role is appreciated. I have often thought farmers should learn from this example and provide similar boards on their farms. They should be situated in areas where the public will come across them such as farm entrances or well used footpaths. One problem is cost. Well made durable, large boards can costs several hundred pounds to make. As of this month, LEAF are rolling out an initiative called “All on Board” that is designed to provide farmers with kits to make farm information boards. The scheme is based on a pick and mix jigsaw. LEAF have produced thirty A4 boards that cover a variety of topics concerning the farm environment. Aspects of farming such as: cereals, oilseeds, grassland or vegetable production are covered as are environmental features such as ponds, hedges, walls and ditches. There are also boards explaining where and why the public should and should not walk. Finally there are boards that give the farm name and maps. The idea is that farmers choose a selection of A4 boards that are most pertinent to their farm and glue them to a larger board. Anyone interested in a brochure about this project can ring LEAF on 02476 413911 or go to the web site www.leafuk.org .. It will also be featured on the LEAF stand at the summer shows. Educating the public about agriculture and the countryside is a tough challenge. The “All on Board “ project helps the farmer meet that challenge by creating a tool for the job. If the tool is put into the right hands it will become a job well done. Hopefully those hands will be yours.
  • Mon, May 16 2005 23:27 In reply to

    LEAF and Integrated Farming

    Guy. I have read your article with great interest. I have tried adopting the "if you wouldn't mind" approach, sadly to no availe. I was prompted to put up signs "asking" the public not to enter a conservation Wetland - when I discovered that fine examples of the Southern Marsh Orchid, that I returned to photagraph, had been "dug up". You say "educating the public is a tough challenge", I think this is an understatement - some people just do not want to know, they will insist that they have the right to roam. Alas, I have no time for these people what-so-ever. Regards. Phil.
  • Tue, May 17 2005 7:54 In reply to

    LEAF and Integrated Farming

    Phil, as someone who regularly locks horns with hare coursers, scramble bikers and moronic rotweiler owners I have every sympathy but I honestly believe 90% of the public who take some sort of recreation in the countryside are reasonably responsible and these are the ones we are targetting with the notice board idea. You will never convince the idiots or the criminally intent with notice boards or even direct confrontation, but if you improved your image as a good steward of the countryside or as a farmer using the countryside to produce wholesome food with just half your visitors that would be a result. And as I say in the article, "trespassers will be prosecuted" means nothing to most people , "conservation area, please keep out" means a lot more. You could even try "Rare wild orchid area, please keep out. Please note there have been criminal attempts to destroy these orchids by visitors to this farm. If you see any suspicious behaviour please contact........" thanks for bothering to plough through the piece Guy
  • Tue, May 17 2005 16:18 In reply to

    LEAF and Integrated Farming

    Guy, Thanks for that, useful for my exam today! Hope we can make use of LEAF on the farm as well.
  • Tue, May 17 2005 22:04 In reply to

    LEAF and Integrated Farming

    Many Thanks Guy. Exactly "how big" are some of these notice boards? :-) I don't think having a "Friends & Neighbours" shoot on the farm helps at times - but if I have to sacrifice my winter "social gatherings", this would be the final straw! Phil. PS - I have taken some strong critisism for agreeing to a farm walk for RSPB members - but I think we should grasp every given oportunity to put some critics straight on certain issues!
  • Wed, May 18 2005 7:49 In reply to

    LEAF and Integrated Farming

    Guy - I have a dilemma with this - colleagues think I have a laid back attitude to people being where maybe the shouldn't. What harm are they doing - probably none so i wish them good day and carry on. However, what I'd really like to do is to leave a positive impression by engaging them in conversation to explain what we do and how we appreciate their interest in our farm. I think the hard headed legal situation is that you may be creating a right of way if you don' take the attitude 'Get orf Moi Land'. I do however have a zero tolerance of motorbikes hare coursers, travellers and Dave Chav with his Rotweiler. Willie
  • Wed, May 18 2005 8:59 In reply to

    LEAF and Integrated Farming

    Willie. Please excuse me for butting in. You make a very valid point - Are people that wonder across "Agricultural" land, at will, going to establish some sort of Public right of way. My approach to people wondering around is usually "can I ask what you are doing". The reply's vary from "oh! are we not supposed to be here", to "minding my own business mate - if you know what is good for you, you will do the same". The latter of these two replies usually results in a "very heated" exchange of obscenity's, the intruder is "usually" put in their place. The Former reply is treated with the respect that it deserves, I inform the people that they are on "Agricultural land" and there is no public access on this land. I go on to inform them that, should they wish to leave their Dogs at home (as I do), they could join in various organised farm walks - Across designated areas of the farm. Of course, It would help if our Landlords where to put up notice boards - my requests seem to have fallen on deaf ears. Last Summer I encountered a chap that had a loopy spaniel running around the set-a-side & into The Fen, I asked him to keep his dog under control as it was disturbing the wildlife & Nesting birds. He replied "what difference does it make - you will only shoot them"! This reinforces my comment to guy, We have a mountain to climb when it comes to educating some people - but I will endevour to try :-) Phil.
  • Wed, May 18 2005 23:09 In reply to

    LEAF and Integrated Farming

    Hope you dont mind me joining this link but thouoght i might add my views I travel around a lot of farms in Wilts ,Hants ,Berks & Oxon & talking to farmers & farm workers the opinions seem to be the same. The right to roam bill as reported by the media left most members of the public under the impression that the whole of the countryside, regardless of what was planted/grazing or whatever, was open for them to do whatver they wanted. A lot of people I talk to in my home town ( The one with the white horse in one corner & the white elephant in the other) are also under this wrong impression. Would it not be agood idea for the media to right some of the wrongs & print/report the facts as they should be?. Maybe with a little help from the media,The task of educating joe public would be a little easier.... Regards. Geoff.
  • Thu, May 19 2005 9:39 In reply to

    LEAF and Integrated Farming

    Geoff, I could not agree more. Half the time it is the media that give the public the "wrong idea". They now have an opportunity to publish the "FACTS" as to where the public may or may-not walk. Our local news (BBC South West) - did actually broadcast a very good report last night, Even some of the walkers agree that this legislation has been "rubber stamped" without enough thought for the people living & working in the countryside. All the Best. Phil.
  • Thu, May 19 2005 12:12 In reply to

    LEAF and Integrated Farming

    Just wait till we all have 2m 'footpaths' around all our fields! Defra should really be doing the publicity as to WHY we're getting 'all these handouts' or what's the point of doing it if public misconceptions mean the very reasons for doing these things are compromised -wildlife disturbed... etc. Suppose the damage a few walkers can do is nothing to the damage farmers were doing to the countryside before they came along and sorted us out.
  • Thu, May 19 2005 12:54 In reply to

    LEAF and Integrated Farming

    Hi Sam. You make a very good point on the "wildlife disturbance". We are pressured & payed to take land out of production for the benifit of the Environment! NOT FOR THE BENIFIT OF THE RAMBLERS, SCRAMBLE BIKERS AND "JO PUBLIC". Why have DEFRA not defended the use of "Wild Bird Seed" options under ELS, it was their idea! Why have the RSPB not given this option there full support - they have been quick enough to blame farmers for allegedly "signifficantly reducing" the number of certain species of farm land Birds in the past. WHERE HAS ALL THE GOOD PUBLICITY GONE??? There, Rant over. Regards. Phil. PS - I think It is high time an official "Agricultural organisation" made a much stronger representation on our behalf.
Page 1 of 1 (12 items)
© RBI 2001-2010
Powered by Community Server (Commercial Edition), by Telligent Systems