Can you do without slug control?
If you can't - and I would imagine that's most arable farmers - then you need to take the threat to metaldehyde very seriously.
We've reported on how it has been detected in water courses in the autumn (http://www.fwi.co.uk/Articles/2008/10/02/112441/slug-control-threatened-by-metaldehyde-residues-being-found-in.html). The problem is that it cannot be removed from water, unlike most other pesticides.
It must be stressed this is not a health issue. The levels being detected exceed the [arbitrary] standard for drinking water of 0.1ppb, while it would take 3000 times that level to cause health problems.
That said, farming has to clean up its act. The fact that metaldehyde has been found widely in raw surface water above the legal limit in the autumn - the peak time for agricultural use - rather than in the summer, suggests it is not a problem caused by garden users. If these peaks occur again next autumn the chances are the product will be banned.
That's why new guidelines are being brought into place (http://www.fwi.co.uk/Articles/2009/01/15/113783/application-limits-to-be-placed-on-slug-killer-to-avoid-potential-ban.html).
But these limits alone may not be enough - they will help in reducing the amount applied - but it is how it is being applied that will also account. How do you apply metaldehyde now? Are you careful to keep it away from water courses? If you're not, and industry sources suggest that some farmers might not be, then a change of mindset needs to happen. Otherwise slug control will get a whole lot harder, and more expensive. It might just make oilseed rape impossible to grow.