Thanks a lot for the effort man, I really appreciate it, :)..
So, basically what you are basic saying is that: GMO's are more disease resistant and able to tolerate higher concentrations of pesticides, but not necessarily provide higher yield, right?
The land is ultra fertile, its located by the river side, between two artificial lakes (down steam aprox 2miles up stream aprox 7miles), furthermore its surrounded by mountains and hills which result in ultra high air-moister, coz of the lakes evaporation gets trapped in-between the mountains/hills. As the result of being placed at the button of the woody mountain side, the autumn rain fertilize it along with the spring snow melt down, by flushing down a lots of mud from the forest above. Furthermore the river is rich on algae (coz of the artificial lake up stream) which act as the fertilizer, given that you use the river to water your crops (so I've been told?).
The climate is relative, it has the same degree of latitude as southern France/ northern Italy (NY, MI, IA, WY).
Currently the land is being cultivated by some poor gipsies (with my approval), they are growing green beans and yields aprox 1.6 - 2.4 kg/m2 (2.harvests) which equals 8-12 tons of green beans per acre (5000m2) without any fertilizers or pesticides! They use the river to irrigate the land. (sometimes the second harvest fails,that's why so big variation).
Given the info above, are there any GMO's that I could benefit from, in form of greater yield?
Thanks in advance, I might sound paranoid but I'm hoping for the best and preparing for the worst.