Farmers Weekly Interactive
You are here  Home>>Arable

Savills / Farmers Weekly Virtual Farm blackgrass model

Hover over each of the five scenario titles on the chart to find out more information on the results and what it could mean to growers.

Declining
Chemical Control
Rotational
Ploughing
Delay
Drilling
Increase
Spring Cropping
Rotational
Fallow

Non-chemical blackgrass control route to sustainable profitability

Non-chemical methods of controlling blackgrass will need greater uptake on farm in the future to keep crop production sustainable and profitable in the face of declining chemical control, according to a new study using the Savills and Farmers Weekly Virtual Farm model unveiled at Cereals 2011.

The Virtual Farm model had been adapted using research results from Rothamsted’s Stephen Moss to forecast the impact of declining herbicide performance and mitigating non-chemical strategies on crop gross margins over a 10-year period, Savill’s Ben Makowiecki explained.

The results showed a steep decline in gross margins, which were all based on 2011 crop prices and costs, once chemical control fell to a level where blackgrass populations were no longer being controlled effectively. “Initially gross margins are relatively stable, but then you fall off the edge of the cliff,” Mr Makowiecki said.

But using non-chemical control options, such as rotational ploughing, delaying wheat drilling and increasing spring cropping in the rotation, showed that blackgrass populations could be contained sufficiently to allow returns to remain much more stable over the 10-year period, even if chemical control declined by 5%.

Rotational ploughing and increasing spring cropping netted the best margins overall, he said. Delayed drilling had the best impact on blackgrass, but margins suffered from a loss of 0.5t/ha yield in the model.

“But if you can successfully delay drilling without decreasing yields, it is definitely a good option to consider.”

Surprisingly, the model suggested that fallowing was not an economic option, however. “That’s based on current research suggesting you get 70-80% decline in the seed-bank from year to year. Our model suggests that isn’t enough to contain blackgrass, and with the loss in income from one year’s cropping, it doesn’t stack up.

“However, if you get higher levels of control from fallowing, or if it was not used in every field, it could become a better economic option,” Mr Makowiecki said.

Virtual Farm

VIRTUAL FARM MODEL

Savills and Farmers Weekly’s Virtual Farm model is a set of business management accounts representing a commercial arable business of 800ha (2000 acres).

It’s broadly representative of a commercial arable farm in the top 25% of the industry. It’s efficient and well-managed, but faces depreciation and investment issues like any arable enterprise.

The model farm has a full profit and loss account, gross margins and projected cash-flows. The budgeted figures are based on data collected from Savills’ client base of managed farms as well as real-world data from grain futures and industry benchmark data for key assumptions.

It allows the research team to form strategies to counter possible shifts in input prices, grain values and other variables, and to identify the pinch-points for cash accounts and production profits.

CRITICAL FACTS & FIGURES

Starting blackgrass population: 58 plants/sq m

Rotation: 58% winter wheat; 30% oilseed rape; 10% spring beans

Yields before blackgrass competition: First wheat 9.2t/ha; second wheat 7.8t/ha; break crops 3.7t/ha

Starting blackgrass chemical control: wheat 95%; break crops 90%

Economic analysis: based on 2011 prices and costs. Gross margins before fixed costs

All scenarios: assume 5% loss in chemical control in every subsequent wheat crop