Farmers Weekly Interactive
You are here  Business
Red Tape

Rip up red tape


RED TAPE: Your chance to help ease the burden

Farmers are being urged to help lift the burden of red tape from the industry by telling government which agricultural legislation they would like abolished.

Read More


Rip Up Red Tape: Work gets under way

Work has already begun on looking at ways to streamline regulations surrounding some of farmers' biggest red-tape gripes.

Read more


Farmers put forward ideas to Rip Up Red Tape

Farmers have started submitting their ideas on how red tape could be cut in agriculture.

Read more


Richard Macdonald: WE NEED YOU

The Taskforce on Farming Regulation's boss, Richard Macdonald, lays out why the industry needs to get behind the new body.

Read more


Red Tape: Farmers Weekly welcomes new taskforce

Red tape. There's too much of it and it drives us round the bend.

Read more


Rip up Red Tape: Eight opportunities to help arable farmers

DEFRA is looking to streamline regulations that cause farmers excessive bureaucracy. Strutt & Parker and the NFU pinpoint examples specific to arable growers

Read more


How to have your say

  • • You can submit your suggestions of the red tape you would like to see ripped up here.
  • • You can also write to: Task Force on Farming Regulation Area, 8D Millbank, DEFRA, Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London SW1P 3JR
  • • Alternatively you can post your suggestions on the Farmers Weekly  forums or send us a letter
  • • You have until Sunday 31 October to get in touch
Richard Macdonald

Which legislation does the industry want to see the back of?

Martin Haworth
NFU director of policy
We have a long shopping list of regulations which should be scrapped or improved but, if forced to name just one, we would like to see a simplification of the regulations applying to animal movements, preserving traceability and disease prevention, but workable, understandable and consistently applied across the country.


Rebecca Marshall
Tenant Farmers Assocation
We would like to see fewer farm inspections. Better co-ordination between DEFRA bodies would mean multiple visits could be avoided by scheduling inspections that cover more than one issue at a time. Exemptions should also be given to farmers who already meet regulatory requirements through membership of assurance scheme such as assured grain and FABBL.


William Worsley
CLA president
There is excessive bureaucracy of the planning system. A great number of projects fail to get off the ground because the developer gives up in frustration at the complexity and cost of the system. The result is a loss of investment, employment and wealth creation in the countryside. Nitrate Vulnerable Zones regulations are also a problem. They are so complex even the Environment Agency struggles to understand them. You are expected to read nine booklets about them and the records are duplicated time and again.


Peter Melchett
The Soil Association
The Soil Association will be calling on Richard Macdonald's 'redtape review' to get rid of duplication for organic farmers between organic standards and demands from DEFRA , the Environment Agency or Natural England for the same information. For example, European organic law controls nutrient applications in organic systems. This should make the extraordinarily detailed form filling required under Nitrogen Vulnerable Zone rules unnecessary.


Barney Kay
National Pig Association general manager
There's a big issue about farming data. It's captured in so many places through things like environmental permits, animal ID registration and tax. Farmers are filling out forms with exactly the same information time and time again. We need the government database to work better and remove the duplication of work that many farmers are doing. There is also more work that can be done with the Environment Agency to simplify legislation around things like Integrated Pollution Prevention Control.

 

 

Bookmark and Share