I have just read yesterday's Telegraph supplement which detailed all the MP's expenses - I'm starting to wonder what all the fuss is about.
Basically they've all had £23 grand. Some of them spent it on mortgage payments, some of them spent it on Scotch eggs (respect to you, Derek Wyatt, Lab, Sittingbourne and Sheppey), some of them let their husbands spend it on blue movies and Kleenex.
It looks as though the maximum that they could claim was £23,083 and this is what most of them have claimed. This was clearly devised as a way of disguising a pay increase. It's kind of irrelevant and a little prurient to worry what it was spent on.
Personally I have no problem with our representatives in Parliament earning a big wage if they are talented, capable and effective. I wouldn't care if they earned £200k per annum if the economy was in good shape, the streets were clean, the young were educated, the sick and poor were cared for and we had a fair judicial system.
And if they are not delivering good results, I don't care how cheap they are; they shouldn't be there.
Still it's not all bad. The Telegraph is starting to realise that it's a newspaper again, we all get a chance to give MPs a hard time and hopefully the hoohah will scupper Margaret Beckett's chances of being the next Speaker of the House of Commons.
Our Secretary of State, Hilary Benn, only claimed £11,631. As my friend Lindsay said,
"Yeh, she wasn't being greedy, was she?"