Yellow rust in wheat – dealing with new races

Every few years, yellow rust hits the headlines as it mutates and overcomes previously resistant varieties.

Slejpner and Robigus are classic examples; now this season, several other varieties, notably Oakley, have joined them in falling victim to another new strain.

While yield, quality and end-markets will continue to be the main drivers behind variety choice, disease resistance must be remembered because of its influence on a variety achieving its potential – and the cost of doing so, says NIAB’s Rosemary Bayles.

“I don’t believe we’re getting too carried away with yellow rust; 2009 certainly brought the disease into prominence because of the impact of recent race changes on several popular varieties and some up and coming ones.”

The season showed once again how the pathogen can evolve to overcome the genes on which varieties depend for resistance.

Variety diversification (see chart) helps growers choose which combinations to grow and eases management spreads the risk, says Dr Bayles.


But few growers, except those in the highest risk areas, routinely make much use of diversification, she admits. “I’m certain there’ll be more interest for next season.

“If yellow rust appears in one variety on the farm, it’s important to know which others on the farm are at risk from the same race and their relative susceptibility. That helps plan the most efficient and cost-effective disease control strategy.”

Seed treatment alone is not the solution, she advises. “If a grower wants to grow, say, Oakley, it would be wise to think about seed treatment as a first line of defence. But it would be sensible to spread the overall rust risk (and reduce seed treatment cost) with less susceptible varieties from other diversification groups.”

New yellow rust races have clearly complicated variety choice and put diversification back on the agenda, says Rothamsted Research’s John Lucas.

But the latest NIAB information shows there are still resistant varieties in all four nabim groups, ie in Group 1 Malacca and Xi19, in Group 2 Panorama , Deben, Scout and Zebedee, in Group 3 Alchemy, JB Diego, Cassius, and Gladiator, and in Group 4 Istabraq.

So some options remain,” says Prof Lucas.

Agronomists’ views

Peter Riley of Prime Agriculture in Norfolk urges growers to take notice of yellow rust ratings.

“It’s clear that Oakley is very susceptible to ‘Solstice” yellow rust.”

He suggests two strategies (see Riley’s rust reasoning below)

Former AICC chairman Peter Taylor admits that despite the scientific excellence of NIAB’s diversification charts, few farmers and advisers use them. But the work remains important, as the fungicide armoury might be depleted, he says.

“Variety choice should always be considered ‘in the round’.”

Looking solely at yellow rust growers might be tempted to drop Oakley for J B Diego, which has similar yield and better grain quality.

“However, JB Diego isn’t blossom midge resistant, and arguably controlling yellow rust is more environmentally friendly than controlling midge.”

Growers in yellow rust hotspots could choose from Group A, adds Mr Taylor. “But remember these individually have issues with other diseases, blossom midge, lower yield, or low protein.

“For those with large acreages, seed dressings on susceptible varieties should be considered.

“Susceptible second wheats should have Jockey to include take-all and yellow rust, while early-drilled first wheat could have the equivalent of Baytan.

Avoid having too much of one variety, is the straightforward advice from Masstock’s Colin Lloyd.

“Maybe keep Oakley just as a first wheat now that we have Duxford and Diego, which are potentially higher yielding than Oakley as second wheats.”

TAG’s Andrew Wells considers it dangerous to place too much reliance on varietal resistance, and more logical to select wheat varieties initially on grain quality, yield and standing ability.

“However, it would be sensible to not grow a large proportion of varieties that are very susceptible to yellow rust in an area where the rust pressure is high.” That should avoid problems if the weather prevents timely spring fungicide applications.

Seed treatments offering foliar activity then may be prudent for very susceptible varieties in high yellow rust areas. “But these treatments shouldn’t be standard on all rust-susceptible varieties across the UK.”

Riley’s yellow rust reasoning

For high risk areas

Growers who don’t want to risk yellow rust or who may have timeliness problems with spraying may need to think about avoiding Oakley and Robigus.

Consider treating all MS varieties (see table) with seed treatment, eg Tripod/Galmano/Jockey. Split the acreage between varieties from new Group B and more resistant ones.

Growers who can spray in a timely fashion should consider a seed treatment or late autumn yellow rust foliar spray on Oakley/Robigus.

It’s probably best to avoid having whole farm in Group B MS and VS varieties.

For lower risk areas

Maybe avoid Oakley/Robigus or use seed treatment. Maybe again avoid all MS and VS varieties in Group B.

Continue with any choice as long as T0 spraying and subsequent timings with appropriate agronomy are guaranteed.

Interim update on the resistance of wheat varieties after recent changes in yellow rust pathotypes*

Group A: Varieties which remain resistant to all current pathotypes

Alchemy R Deben R JB Diego R Scout R Cassius R Gladiator R Malacca R Xi 19 R Claire R Istabraq R Panorama R Zebedee R

Group B: Varieties susceptible to the “new” pathotype first identified on Solstice. Some of these varieties are also susceptible to “older” pathotypes. There is a high risk of infection spreading between varieties in this group.

Humber MR Solstice MS Mascot MS Gallant MS QPlus MR Viscount MS Glasgow MS Robigus VS Ketchum MS Consort MS Soissons MS Oakley VS

Group C: Other varieties, which may be at moderate risk if grown with Group B varieties

Battalion MR Hereward MS Einstein MS Marksman MR Duxford MS

Group D: Varieties which are susceptible to specific pathotypes, but are at low risk of spread from Group B and Group C varieties

Timber MR Cordiale MR

* Based on results from the UKCPVS project, funded by FERA and HGCA and carried out at NIAB.

R = resistant MR = moderately resistant MS = moderately susceptible VS = very susceptible