Advice for farmers on switching lenders in a competitive market

Lending to farming is a competitive market, with some banks active in seeking new farm business.

While farmers have historically switched banks very infrequently, and often not at all, finance costs should be reviewed regularly, says consultant Sophie Cahill of the Farm Consultancy Group’s registered credit broker, Midwest Consulting.

“Don’t be scared to change lenders or to do it on a regular basis,” she says. “Borrowing should be reviewed just like any other input.”

See also: Budget highlights need for inheritance document housekeeping

For farmers looking to refinance by moving banks, one lender is waiving the arrangement fee, which is typically 1% of the facility being arranged.

“When taking out new finance, whether it be completely new money or refinancing existing debt, the arrangement fees charged can often make the process appear restrictive, or even unaffordable,” says Sophie.

“However, this needn’t be the case. These fees are now open to an element of negotiation – there are deals to be had. Even if you’re not planning to move, it’s worth exploring what other lenders are offering.

“The main thing is to be prepared with the information the bank might want. This doesn’t necessarily mean forward budgets – sound businesses will find good sets of accounts acceptable to lenders.

“That is, unless you are planning something new in the business, in which case budgets will be needed.”

However, tenants have to work harder on borrowing proposals because they cannot offer the security of owner-occupiers.

When looking to switch lenders, most banks prefer to take on both the farm’s overdraft and loan borrowing, but in some cases they will offer to fund just the overdraft if they think there is a longer-term prospect of getting the loan business too, says Sophie.

Covenants

A covenant is a condition attached to lending that requires a certain performance level from the customer business in order to keep the facility. These are being used less now than in the recent past, says Sophie.

Increased competition

At finance broker and mortgage adviser ­Ashbridge Partners, managing director Mark Ashbridge says that in the past two years the farm lending market has been more competitive than at any time since 2008.

“The main banks are making more profit as a result of the higher base rate,” he says.

“When base rates were close to zero, there was less scope for them to make a good margin on deposits, so now that they are more profitable, they are able to roll some of that into the market if they want to increase their market share.

“The banks are more accommodating and more pragmatic. Also, there has been quite a move to interest-only lending to farming, rather than the traditional capital and interest.”

With up to 15 lenders in the market, he suggests using a broker to find good deals.

“More and more business is arranged through intermediaries,” he says. “The banks pay us significant commission to bring and present business to them because they have rationalised their staff on the front line.”

The market and appetite for lending to farming is continually changing, with lenders coming in and out of the market at short notice.

“Sometimes they want more, sometimes they shut the door,” says Mark, pointing out that a broker will know who is in the market and what deals have been done.

He puts arrangement fees generally at 0.5% to 1%, with the lower end of this usually for larger sums of several million pounds.

Lower arrangement fees can be found, sometimes in a nominal sum with an additional charge loaded onto the margin over base, he says.  

With the expectation of lower base rates, little fixed-rate business is being done and there is little or no premium to fix over the cost of variable-rate borrowing.

Potential profit from early repayment

Fixed-rate borrowing taken out years ago at historically low rates offers the potential, in some cases, to profit by ending these deals early, says Mark Ashbridge.

“A number fixed at, say, 3% for 20 years may still have 12 or 13 years to run. That can generate profit if you break that agreement.

“A lot of people with this type of borrowing are not aware they can profit from that.”

Clients have the flexibility to refinance to another lender while crystallising the profit or value of the fixed rate that was put in place when rates were lower.

This is particularly relevant when their existing lender is unable to support their current needs, for example purchase of a new farm or a new investment, and so they are not giving up the value of the historic fixed rate.

Total borrowing rises

The latest figures from the Bank of England show that farming and forestry businesses were borrowing almost £18.3bn at the end of May this year.

This is 3.7% more than a year earlier. In both years farmers were using 86% of the facilities available.

Interest represents growing proportion of farm profit

The latest Defra analysis of farm balance sheets and farming performance shows that net interest payments accounted on average for 21% of farm business income (FBI) in 2023-24, a rise of 13 percentage points compared with 2022-23.

The analysis covers farms with accounting years ending between 1 March 2023 and 29 February 2024, with interest rates having risen steeply in late 2022 as a result of the so-called “mini-budget” following Liz Truss briefly becoming prime minister.

While the average percentage of total asset value represented by liabilities has changed little in the past 10 years, there was a big drop in the average liquidity ratio.

This indicates a reduced ability to meet current liabilities from current assets and fell 21 percentage points to 295%.

The figures come from Defra’s analysis of the profitability and resilience of commercial farm businesses in England, using data from the Farm Business Survey, updated in May 2025.

Commercial farm businesses are defined as those with an agricultural output of more than £21,000 a year.

They represent about half of the total farming population but account for more than 95% of output and over 90% of agricultural land in England.

FBI represents the financial return on all unpaid labour (farmers and spouses, non-principal partners and their spouses, and family workers) and on their capital invested in the farm business, including land and buildings.

For corporate businesses it represents the financial return on the shareholders’ capital invested in the farm business. In essence, FBI is the same as net profit.

Key results

  • Net interest payments accounted on average for 21% of FBI in 2023-24, a rise of 13 percentage points from 2022-23.
  • The average level of liabilities was £300,000 a farm in 2023-24, a rise of 3% compared with 2022-23.
  • The average net worth per farm was £2.4m and 23% of farms had a net worth of at least £3m.
  • The average gearing ratio (percentage of total asset value represented by liabilities) was 11% in 2023-24. This has shown little change over the past decade.
  • The average liquidity ratio fell by 21 percentage points to 295% in 2023-24. The liquidity ratio indicates a farm’s ability to finance its immediate financial demands, or current liabilities, from current assets – easily realised assets such as cash, savings or stock. A liquidity ratio equal to or above 100% shows that a farm can meet its current liabilities using current assets.
  • The average return on capital was -0.8% in 2023-24, a fall of 1.4 percentage points compared with 2022-23.