Row brews over generic fungicide Cortez

The first generic formulation of a key triazole fungicide, epoxiconazole, has been launched amid claims of competitor muck-raking from its manufacturer.
Speaking at the launch of Cortez to independent agronomists and farmer-buying groups, Makhteshim-Agan‘s Mike Barrett said he was fed up with “everyone else in the market” talking negatively about his firm’s product.
“The industry is saying this is a poor quality formulation and why risk using it. But I am 100% certain Cortez will perform as well as Opus.”
Some of the “misinformation” was coming from trials done using a generic formulation of epoxiconazole Makhteshim sells in Poland, called Soprano, he said. “But Cortez has nothing to do with Soprano. It is a completely different formulation.”
He pointed to Makhteshim’s record of producing effective formulations in the past. “When have we ever launched a formulation that hasn’t worked?” he asked.
The major manufacturers used a number of other techniques to defend their market share of these products, he said, including bringing in supplementary patents and the introduction of mixtures involving the active ingredient.
Those mixtures were then priced “competitively” to make it difficult for the generic formulation to compete, he said.
With fewer new products likely to be launched, the nearly 20% of off-patent products that are still controlled by the patent holder would become increasingly valuable, he continued.
“And cereal fungicides are the jewel in the crown, worth ÂŁ140m a year. Bayer, BASF and Syngenta control over 85% of that market.”
New co-formulations were being launched this year, he suggested. “In 2000 epoxiconazole sales were dominated by the straight product. Now less than a third is sold as the straight. Some has been innovation, such as mixes with the strobilurins. Now it is preparations for the defence.
“It is no surprise to us that Ennobe is coming in. I will suggest its pricing will be lower [for the equivalent amount of epoxiconazole].”
Mr Barrett said far from robbing the industry of its life blood, generics promoted competition. “Stifling innovation stops those manufacturers from having to find new products and answers. It prevents products from moving down to the ‘gold zone’ where there is increased choice, more competition, which is better for agronomists and growers.”
Epoxiconazole was the most significant patent expiry to date, he claimed. “It is a massively important active ingredient. If you sit back and don’t allow increased competition, the status quo will remain.
“Support Cortez on recommendation sheets and growers will see more choice,” he told the agronomists.”
Independent and regulatory trials supported the performance of Cortez, Makhteshim’s Stuart Hill told Farmers Weekly.
In an ADAS trial both epoxiconazole products gave similar control of septoria and yellow rust, and similar yields, Jonathan Blake of ADAS confirmed.
A second generic epoxiconazole formulation, Rubric from Cheminova (Headland), will also be available this spring.
BASF denies talking about Cortez Epoxiconazole developer BASF denied talking specifically about Cortez to industry representatives. “BASF is not talking about competitor brands of generic epoxiconazole in the market. We focus on the strengths of all our products and brands particularly new innovation such as Ennobe and Brutus this season,” said the firm’s Rosie Bryson. “What we would say to growers is just be aware that there are different generic products out there, and some are better than others.” That had been confirmed in tests the firm had conducted on a range of generic epoxiconazole formulations, she said. “The main point is variability, uncertainly and lack of UK on-farm experience with these products. BASF Opus has been on the market for 14 years.” But Dr Bryson wouldn’t confirm whether BASF had conducted comparison trials using Makhteshim’s Cortez formulation |
---|
.