Take the right steps to avoid costly cow lameness

Lameness isn’t just a problem for high-yielding herds. Letting cows out to graze can soon eat up cost savings if rough tracks or poor animal handling lead to sore feet.


Grazing herds may not see the same types of lameness as high-yielding ones, but a combination of poor cow tracks and impatient herdsmen soon deliver the same results. All lame cows eat less, lose weight and take longer to get back in-calf.


Because New Zealand’s grazing herds tend to walk much longer distances to and from pasture, a big cause of lameness is excessive sole wear, which makes feet vulnerable to stone penetration, says Gloucestershire vet Roger Blowey of Wood Vet Group.


New Zealand vet Neil Chesterton has found a strong correlation between lameness in these herds, cow behaviour and how people handle cows. He visited Britain this summer to discuss lameness with Mr Blowey’s clients (see case study) and found that British farmers have the same problems with tracks and shed design. “They get the same types of lameness as I am used to, but it is further complicated by digital dermatitis on some farms,” says Mr Chesterton.


Two key factors from the talks picked out by Mr Blowey were track condition and aggressive handling when cows are taken to and from the parlour. “Camber on tracks needs to be a maximum 5% slope from the track centre to the edge. More than this and cows feel uncomfortable and start to push uphill with their outer claw which increases lameness.”


He says a normal cow walks and stands with her head down to see where to place a front foot, as well as react to a problem. “When a cow stands on a stone with the front foot, she can take the weight off that foot by throwing her head in the air. Standing on a stone with a hind foot, she compensates by throwing the head down.”


Allowing for normal behaviour, cows should move along tracks at 3km/hour. But tracks have to be wide enough: At least 5m, or 6.5m for 400 cows. Once in the collecting yard, backing gates should be used correctly, not aggressively.


Wiring them up to shock cows into moving makes them frightened and banging hocks will have a bad effect, too. They turn to face the gate and as it comes towards them, they can’t get away. This increases the number of pivot movements – and reduces milk let down. Mr Blowey also points out that cows react to side pressure. “They need plenty of space and try to escape from side forces by pushing towards the pressure, using the leg closest to the offending object. This puts extra force on the hind claw and leads to extra wear and lameness.”







Case study: Keith Davis, Chepstow
Keith Davis admits he was sceptical about cows moving through the collecting yard in sub-groups of four or five led by a boss cow. But when vet Neil Chesterton visited Lord Bledisloe’s 420-cow herd at Lydney Park Farms near Chepstow, the dairy herd manager saw with his own eyes natural cow flow.
“Cows go in the parlour in the same order every day and won’t go until the cow they normally follow has been in. This means we end up fetching them,” says Mr Davis. “However, we left the backing gate off and could see cows that were right at the back suddenly weave their way up through the group and into the parlour.”
Since then, the backing gate has only been used to sub-divide the herd groups, not move cows. Milking is not only smoother, but takes at least 20 minutes less because the operator no longer gets out of the pit to get cows in.
An additional change was to put hardboard on tin doors in the collecting yard after Mr Chesterton pointed out that they were scaring the cows. “When cows hit them, the doors made quite a bang, so they would turn and face them out of fear. Now, cows all stand parallel, facing the parlour, which effectively makes the collecting yard wider because they are all pointing in the right direction.”


More from Neil Chesterton



  • Neil Chesterton will be speaking at Wood Vet Group, Gloucestershire on 12 January 2009. Contact: 01452 541 663.
  • More information on Mr Chesterton’s work