
Arable farmers across England are being urged to adopt a range
of measures to help benefit the countryside through a new voluntary
scheme launched last week.
The Campaign for the
Farmed Environment, put together by the
NFU and other key
industry partners, is designed to head off the threat of a
compulsory scheme.
To succeed, it must show the environment is benefiting at least
as much under a voluntary scheme as it did under set-aside, by
meeting key targets by June 2012.
Persuading farmers to adopt voluntary land management practices
is not going to be easy, Andrew Clark,
NFU head of policy
services, admits. "It's asking a lot of the farming community. This
is about collective responsibility, and that's the real
challenge."
But he is convinced it will work. "A voluntary approach can
deliver the best stewardship, is very flexible and will encourage
everyone to do their bit. It's practical and makes sound business
sense."
A compulsory scheme, on the other hand, would have adversely
affected
Entry Level Stewardship and wouldn't have delivered the best
quality benefits, says Mr Clark. "Cross-compliance is also very
expensive to administer."
While most of the debate about the environmental value of
set-aside centred around birds, it had much wider benefits, Mr
Clark says. To reflect that, CFE targets three key themes - water
and soil protection, farmland birds and farm wildlife.
Farmers will be encouraged to use a combination
of Entry Level Stewardship, uncropped land and increased
voluntary environmental management to deliver the
improvements.
A target, agreed with
DEFRA,
has been set for each. "The aim is to double the uptake of choice
environment options, such as conservation headlands and grass
strips, within ELS, increasing them by 40,000ha," says Mr
Clark.
"But only the options within the table count towards that
target. They have been chosen because they offer high wildlife
value but have lower uptake within ELS - for example, compared with
over-winter stubble.
"We also intend to retain the area of uncropped land at
179,000ha, and to increase the amount of high-quality, voluntary
environmental management over three years by 30,000ha."
"Buffer strips, permanent fallows and uncropped land all helped
to buffer watercourses and protected soils from erosion, and are
very much part of the new scheme.
"For farmland birds, we have included options that provide
winter spring and summer feed, as well as breeding habitat. And
pollen and nectar sources were good for wildlife, and we wanted to
replicate this in the CFE."
While the total area under CFE won't match set-aside, Mr Clark
believes the environmental benefits are potentially greater. "In
this scheme we are looking to promote high-quality management in
the right locations.
"Having taken advice from scientists working for the
British Trust for
Ornithology, RSPB,
Natural England and the
Environment
Agency, we know this will deliver much more compared with the
accidental benefits of set-aside."
A wide array of management practices (see table, right) have
been established to help farmers deliver. "E" options are those
already available in the ELS scheme, while "C" options are
voluntary. Some are duplicated, so farmers who have achieved their
ELS points can switch to C references after that, to avoid
confusion.
"We have also chosen options that are a bit more experimental or
offer more flexibility, so might be more attractive to farmers,"
says Mr Clark. "For example, we have taken account of the fact that
there are things you can do in 0.25/ha that, if
you get it right that will have huge benefits for bumblebees, but
that would not be eligible for ELS."
Mr Clark hopes this sort of flexibility will help persuade
farmers whose initial ELS agreements are ending to return to the
scheme, a task made more difficult by DEFRA's decision to no longer
allow management plans to count towards ELS points.
"That can be a problem for some farmers. But there remains a
good incentive to renew or take up stewardship. ELS is worth £30/ha
across the farm, and we have included some high-value options that
can be worth hundreds of pounds a hectare on parts of the farm that
could never hope to make that sort of return when cropped [see
table below].
CFE Management
Options | | | |
Management
options* | Option title | Resource
protection | Farmland birds | Wildlife |
C1/EJ9 | Grass buffers alongside
watercourses | X | | X |
C2/EJ5 | Grass areas to prevent erosion and
run-off | X | | |
EF1 | Management of field corners | X | | X |
C3a/b | Reverted arable areas/optional scrub
management | X | | X |
C4/EF8 | Skylark plot | | X | |
C5/EF13 | Fallow plots/uncropped, cultivated areas
for groundnesting birds | | X | X |
C6 | Overwinter stubble followed by
spring/summer fallow | | X | X |
C7a | Overwintered stubbles | | X | X |
C7b | Overwintered stubbles - optional for
vulnerable stubbles | | X | X |
EJ13 | Winter cover crops | X | | |
EF15 | Reduced herbicide cereal crop preceding
over-wintered stubble | | X | X |
EF22 | Extended winter stubbles | | X | X |
EG4 | Cereals for whole-crop silage followed by
overwintered stubbles | | X | X |
C8/EF11 | Uncropped, cultivated margins | | X | X |
C9/EF2/ | Wild bird seed mixture | | X | |
EG2 | [arable/grassland areas] | | | |
C10 | Game strips | X | | |
C11/EF10 | GWCT un-harvested cereal
headlands | | X | X |
EF9 | Unfertilised cereal headlands | | X | X |
C12a/EF4/ | Pollen and nectar mixture | | X | X |
EG3 | for arable/grassland areas | | | |
C12b | Pollen and nectar mixtures for use with
horticultural crops | | X | X |
C13 | Sown wildflower headlands | X | X | X |
EF7 | Beetlebanks | | | X |
C14 | Selective use of spring
herbicides | | X | X |
C15 | Enhanced management of SRC [willow or
poplar only] | | | X |
*C options - Campaign for the Farmed
Environment voluntary measure | | | |
*E options - Entry Level Stewardship
[ELS] option | | | |
"Farmers are also telling us that they need much more
information on the various ELS options. So we and
Natural England
have made a much greater effort to highlight the areas that will
deliver the goods, and hopefully it will now be easier to choose
the right ones for a particular farm.
"My view is that with a little bit of individual effort,
everyone succeeds. If every farmer chose one extra ELS or voluntary
option, that would make a massive difference."
Good access to expert advice is crucial with such an ambitious
scheme. About 41,000 farmers who farm at least 10ha of crops in
more than 20 key arable counties will be specifically targeted,
though all English arable farmers will be encouraged to take
part.
"This will be a national campaign with a local personality," Mr
Clark says. "Activities will be co-ordinated at county level. Local
liason groups chaired by local farmers are already being
established. There will be three or four to a county to provide
tailored advice.
"We are also training 1500 advisers - agronomists and business
advisers that farmers will already know. And we shall establish
beacon farms that will demonstrate best practice relevant to the
farmers in that area."
All farmers will receive a farm record through the post in
January. "This will set out the campaign, and will contain a record
sheet - just one table - so farmers can record the options they are
already doing."
Progress will then be monitored on one in 400 farms but Mr Clark
stresses that farmers will not be penalised for slip-ups as would
have happened under a compulsory cross-compliance scheme.
"We are confident that praise, rather than penalty, is the way
to deliver stewardship, so we are not interested in field-by-field
data-keeping. If a strip is 2.5m wide rather than 3m, we are not
going to throw the farmer out of the campaign, nor will he be
fined. That's got to be better for the farm business, and better
for the environment."
Midlands Barometer farmer Tony Reynolds, who farms 247ha acres
at Thurlby Grange near Bourne, Lincolnshire, and 1000ha near Melton
Mowbray, Leicestershire, took part in an ELS pilot but dropped it
when the points system was changed.
However, he will be taking up a range of options under CFE. "I
think it's smashing," he says. "There is a degree of practicality
built in to this which has been missing from other schemes. There
are some real positives - a good selection of options, so there's
something to suit everyone, whatever type of arable operation they
run."
Overwintered stubble options are especially appealing, as are
grass buffers, some of which are already installed as part of the
Catchment Sensitive Farming initiative. "The whole thing ties
together what agencies, farmers and wildlife want," says Mr
Reynolds. "I have high hopes for it."
Southern barometer grower Andy Barr, who farms 627ha at East
Lenham Farm, Lenham, Kent, is right behind the new scheme.
He already has many of the options in place, under OLES.
However, he is considering more covering cropping, extended
winter stubbles and possible cereal whole-crop followed by winter
stubbles on some organic land.
"Being negative, CFE does sound like another 'compulsory
voluntary' scheme, such as ACCS or VI," Mr Barr says.
"However, we have to respond to what our customers want and we,
like most farmers, care about wildlife and soils and a want to help
anyway.
"I am a fan of farming the main part of the field for plentiful
food and margins, corners and poor fields for wildlife. This will
help us do this with little effort, so it's well worth it.
"Not being too pedantic about marging widths and the like is a
major step forward. All of us should get involved to discourage a
return to an inspection and fine basis."
CFE-PROMOTED ELS
OPTIONS |
What are they
worth? |
EJ9 12m buffer strips along watercourses
on cultivated land £400/ha EF1 Managed field corners £400/ha EF2 Wild bird seed mixtures £450/ha EF 7 Beetle banks £580/ha EF9 Unfertilised cereal field margins
£100/ha |
New for next year* EF22 extended winter stubbles
(£410/ha) EJ13 Winter cover crops (£65/ha) *Subject to EU
confirmation |
For further information about targets, themes and voluntary
measures as well as details about local activities, visit
www.cfeonline.org.uk