Budget cropping decisions carefully to minimise losses

Cropping decisions must take account of their impact on the whole business, warns adviser Gary Markham.

He fears too much emphasis is being placed on comparing net cost of production with market prices. This could lead to poor decisions on rotational change, including some people considering fallow, he says.

“Calculating total cost of production per tonne may be an interesting academic exercise but is of little value in making business decisions,” says Mr Markham, of Churchgate Accountants.

“This is particularly relevant as we head into the Cereals event when minds will be focused on planning future cropping. 

See also: Cereals 2015 preview of crop plots

“Many farmers are hearing others say that they are considering not growing oilseed rape and being influenced to coming to the same conclusion based on a negative total cost of production.

“The simple point is that if a crop is not grown, many of the so-called fixed costs are not saved – they are still left in the business. For example property, administration including farm insurance, labour – subject to some overtime and many machinery costs, excluding fuel.”

The cost of production approach, especially where fallow is being considered, runs the risk of some farms making even bigger losses than they would otherwise face, says Mr Markham.

“The key message is to calculate the margin after variable production costs as a contribution to the fixed costs of the business and not to make decisions based on total cost of production/tonne.”

A partial budget and not cost of production should be used to make decisions such as these, says Mr Markham.

This evaluates the financial effect of incremental changes in a business, for example by comparing the introduction of or increase in one enterprise with the reduction in another. The extra income generated and costs saved by a decision are measured against the reduction in income and extra costs incurred by taking an  alternative route.

A partial budget only includes resources that will be changed.

They can also be used to calculate the net margin a tonne or an acre for a crop as a contribution to the fixed costs of the business – after accounting for seed, fertiliser, sprays, fuel, agronomy and other costs directly associated with growing the crop (see table).

Taking data based on several thousand acres of cropping from Churchgates’ 2014 harvest benchmarking survey, Mr Markham illustrates how this approach can help with typical cropping decision-making in a loss-making business.

“The table shows that oilseed rape has a negative cost of production of £28/t. Therefore is the conclusion not to grow it and save this overall cost per tonne of £28?

“If the land is left fallow, the cost of production argument might lead someone to conclude that the loss will be avoided and the business overall loss will reduce.”

However, a partial budgeting exercise based on actual 2014 crop prices shows:

  • OSR makes a contribution of £152/t to the fixed overhead cost of the business
  • OSR makes a contribution of £211/acre to the fixed overhead costs of the business
  • Therefore if OSR is not grown and any land left fallow, this will result in a greater overall loss to the business because the fixed costs are spread across a lower acreage.

“The business would still be making a loss on its OSR acreage, but it would be reducing the loss compared with fallow because the OSR crop is contributing £211/acre of the £245/acre fixed costs which would be there whether the crop is grown or not.”

All of the figures in the table assume that the acreages and systems on this example farm are unchanged for the 2016 harvest.

“If any structural changes were being considered, for example labour, machinery or a significant change in the acreage farmed, then this would give the opportunity to examine the fixed cost base but that is a different consideration and exercise.”

Within the constraints of the agronomy and the RPA rules, based on the 2014 prices, wheat area should be maximised, followed by spring beans, followed by OSR, says Mr Markham.

*Gary Markham is director of farms and estates for Churchgates accountants. He won the Farmers Weekly adviser of the year award in 2014.

 

Calculating production costs

         

Barley

Wheat

OSR

Sp Beans

Yield  –  t/acre actual 2014 harvest

2.94

4.01

1.39

1.78

Variable costs

               

Seeds

       

24

24

21

30

Ferts

       

65

80

79

16

Chemicals

       

75

90

78

48

Other

       

15

15

15

15

                 

Total variable cost £/acre

   

179

209

193

109

Total variable cost £/t

   

61

52

139

61

Fixed costs

 

Per acre

           

Labour

 

82

           

Depreciation

54

           

Spares and repairs

30

           

Contracting

20

           

Fuel

 

37

           

Other

 

3

           

Property

 

25

           

Admin

 

31

           

Total fixed costs

282

   

96

70

203

158

                 

Cost of production £/tonne

   

157

122

342

220

Price actual average 2014 £/t

   

123

129

314

211

                 

Net margin per tonne 2014 harvest £/t

 

-34

7

-28

-9

                 

Partial Budget

             

Yield – t/acre actual 2014 harvest

2.94

4.01

1.39

1.78

Price £/t actual 2014

   

123

129

314

211

 Variable production costs

           

Seeds

       

24

24

21

30

Ferts

       

65

80

79

16

Chemicals

       

75

90

78

48

Other

       

15

15

15

15

Fuel

       

37

38

32

26

Total variable production cost £/acre

 

216

247

225

135

Output £/acre

362

517

436

376

Contribution to fixed costs £/acre (margin after income from crop sales less total variable production costs)

146

270

211

241

Fixed costs excl fuel £/acre

   

245

245

245

245

Total variable production cost £/t

 

73

62

162

76

Contribution to fixed costs £/t (margin after income from crop sales less total variable production costs)

50

67

152

135

Fixed costs excl fuel £/t

   

83

61

176

138

Need a contractor?

Find one now