BYDV: Lessons from 2026 on how to reduce risk
BYDV in winter barley © Blackthorn Arable Last season proved to be a perfect storm where earlier drilling, higher aphid numbers, milder conditions and increased virus levels all combined in one of the worst seasons for barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV).
A much higher incidence of the virus was seen in winter barley and wheat crops across all parts of the UK, not just in the usual hotspots.
Fortunately, there are some lessons that, combined with a new forecasting tool launched by the AHDB, could help farmers manage the risk in the coming season.
See also: How nature-friendly practices built farm’s climate resilience
Hutchinsons’ technical manager and agronomist, Will Foss, has been investigating the reasons ahead of the new cropping season.
Reasons
Aphid numbers and activity
Reviewing last season, there were the ideal weather conditions for the vectors – grain aphids and the bird cherry oat aphid.
Will points to suction trap data showing a lot of bird cherry oat aphids last autumn. Grain aphids tend not to be seen much in the autumn.
AHDB virus testing also showed higher levels of infected aphids.
In autumn 2025, 34% of aphids tested carried the virus, which is the highest in the past seven years.
So not only were there more aphids, but more were carrying the virus.
It’s not just numbers, aphid activity is important with temperatures being a key driver.
Looking at weather data in Suffolk, he says it never really got cold enough to kill aphids over winter and early spring.
“It needs to go down to -4C for bird cherry and -7-8C for the grain aphid.”
In fact, temperatures were high enough for them to fly and spread the virus.
Will explains that they need a minimum of 11C to fly and 6C to transmit the virus to the crop.
“In his area, data for winter/spring showed a 6C minimum, so they were able to transmit virus and there were days when they were flying, too.”
The milder winter also saw several generations of aphid, as there were eight T170C (T-sum) T170 accumulations from September to early April. T-sum is a predictor of aphid development, he explains.
“So lots of vectors plus more virus meant conditions were conducive for the virus to spread in spring.”

Bird cherry-oat aphid © Blackthorn Arable
More habitat
One underlying issue is the opening up of the landscape, making it more favourable for insects.
This is increasing aphid numbers, resulting in a greater reservoir of virus.
This is a combination of Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) habitats (any grass-containing habitat) and crops that have not been sprayed with an insecticide.
Some of this is down to more farmers choosing not to spray, perhaps they have an SFI no insecticide option. However, he warns this puts crops at greater risk.
Early drilling
The final reason was the early harvest and subsequent earlier start to drilling.
“The earlier you drill, the more challenges to BYDV crops have.
“Now we have seen another early harvest and the concern is that we may see earlier drilling again.”
However, Will says one good thing about this summer is the lower quantity of forage. All the grass died off, so there was less habitat to support aphids.
However, while the starting point may be lower this autumn, numbers can build quickly again.
Actions
Don’t rely on crop observations
Will advises growers not to rely on crop observations.
“With aphids, you are working on risk. The suction trap network is a good resource, and the data can show if you are likely to have aphids in crops.
“However, they work on an 80km radius, so there isn’t full country coverage.”
Therefore, farmers may be tempted to look for aphids in crops themselves, but they are getting caught out, warns Will.
“It is not a reliable way to assess risk, as you can’t check every plant.”
Grain aphids tend to move to the top of the plant while bird cherry oat aphids are at the bottom.
Bird cherry oat aphids even hide below soil level, so are easy to miss, he explains.
Remove green bridge
Later drilling is an obvious measure, but an early harvest and fears about drought next year could see earlier drilling. So what else can farmers do?
Will recommends removing any direct green bridge transfer – preventing the direct movement of aphids from grassweeds or cereal volunteers.
“If there is green stuff at drilling, there will be direct transfer of aphids.”
This year, the drought has delayed the flushes of volunteers, so the concern is that will appear around drilling or soon afterwards.
“If there is a late flush and are sprayed off, there is still a risk even if they are yellowing.
Will explains that’s because yellowing plants are more attractive to aphids due to the colour change and the higher concentration of sugars after being sprayed off.
Ideally, farmers need a wider gap between spraying off and drilling, with 10 days better than two.
Use of resistant varieties
The use of resistant varieties of winter barley is a complex area due to the terminology used.
Kestrel is the first winter barley described as resistant, before that they were termed tolerant.
Will says there is a perception that anything described as resistant will not get BYDV. However, this is not the case as seen earlier this year.
Resistant varieties can still get BYDV, and farmers can still see a yield loss when they are under high disease pressure.
“Varieties are a useful tool, but they have to be used along with other measures, you can’t just rely on genetics,” he says.
Resistance gives farmers some leeway, such as on outlying land that they can’t get an insecticide on as quickly.
It gives farmers a bit of time, but they should not assume they don’t need spraying and won’t be affected by BYDV in higher pressure situations.
Chemistry
The key problem is the reliance on just one group of chemistry – pyrethroids. They work by contact, therefore, good coverage is essential.
Furthermore, not being systemic means any new growth is not protected.
One observation from last season was a lot of late infection with upper canopy symptoms that tested positive for the MAV strain.
This strain tends to be carried more by the grain aphid, suggesting an increase in grain aphids.
There is known pyrethroid resistance in grain aphids. Therefore, a key concern is this late infection may be the result of increased resistance.
Choice of pyrethroid

© GNP
Pyrethroids are not all the same, with robust research suggesting one of them offers greater persistency in its control.
Aliona Jones, technical demand creator at Sumitomo Chemical, points out that while there is resistance to pyrethroids, farmers can still get up to 70-80% control with effective applications.
Choice of pyrethroid can also help, with strong research showing that esfenvalerate offers a bit more than the alternatives.
So why is it different? She points out that while they are all in Group 3 (sodium channel modulators), the chemical structure is a bit different.
She explains that the cyclopropyl ring in other pyrethroids such as cypermethrin and lambda-cyhalothrin make them more sensitive to UV light.
In addition, esfenvalerate is the only pyrethroid with a phenyl-acetate radical, which leads to improved persistence in the field.
Esfenvalerate offers control through three different ways – repelling aphids, control through contact and also through ingestion.
In trials, they saw greater persistence with knockdown over a longer period.
If used at 165ml/ha as recommended for autumn use, it offered persistence for six weeks.
This is due to it being two to three times more photostable than others.
In another trial, there was as much esfenvalerate active remaining on the leaf after 14 days as there was for lambda after just 2.5 days.
Aliona’s colleague, commercial agro manager Ruth Stanley, says this means farmers may not need to spray as often.
Ruth also says it is safer for predators and pollinators, being one of the less toxic pyrethroids to bees.
However, Aliona adds that it is still non-selective, so farmers still need to practice stewardship when using it.
“Treat it as you would with other pyrethroids, but knowing that it has a kinder profile.”
Case study: James Freeth, Cornwall
Like many farmers across the UK, James Freeth had one of the worst seasons for barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) in 2026 on his farm in Cornwall.
Farming right up to the Cornish coast, field selection is a major risk factor with the disease.
James says BYDV has always been a challenge, but there were more chemical options including seed treatments.
However, recent years have seen it become more of a problem.
He explains that it is mainly a problem with winter barley in the more sheltered fields.
“In the more exposed fields near the cliffs, we don’t see it. Last season [2024-25], most barley was grown in the exposed fields and we didn’t see it.”
James says it tends to be more a problem in the valleys and other sheltered areas and this season turns out to be the worst with patches in many fields.
He points to one field – the top is exposed and there was no virus, but where it dipped down into the valley, there were the patches.
He estimates that yields were down by one-third in affected fields.
His agronomist, James Whatty, recalls there were four to five T-sums (170C) by the new year and it didn’t get below 12C in Truro last winter, so few aphids were killed.
This coming season, James Freeth is cutting back his winter barley area from the normal 40-60ha to 10-20ha. He is growing more second wheat instead.
The risk will be lower as wheat is drilled later – he is aiming for the second week of October onwards, with the barley in lower risk fields.
James Freeth also looks to minimise the green bridge, spraying off stubbles before drilling and he tries to keep stubbles clean.
However, being in a mixed farming area with grass fields, controlling aphids is a challenge.
He has used pyrethroids in the past, but the problem is not being able to travel to get more passes on later in the autumn.
He has tried diatomaceous earth, which can kill aphids by scratching their soft bodies and drying them out, but results were limited.
Looking to the future, he is considering trialling a resistant variety when the barley returns to the more sheltered fields.
New BYDV tool
The AHDB’s new barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) risk tool considers more risk factors than the aphid T-sum tool that it is replacing, helping farmers make better decisions on when to spray.
The new tool is powered by a model trained on the bird cherry-oat aphid, which in most situations is known to be the most significant BYDV vector across the UK.
This is mainly due to the relatively high numbers that fly in the autumn.
The BYDV tool considers:
- Local temperatures, including historic, actual and forecast data for the next nine days
- The number of aphids flying (historic and actual data)
- The proportion that carries the virus
- Local risk factors, such as surrounding land use
- The relationship between infection and yield and financial losses in susceptible varieties.
A major advance over the T-sum tool is the inclusion of bird cherry-oat data, as it becomes available as the season progresses.
This data is from the GB Rothamsted Insect Survey suction-trap network, which covers England and Wales plus a suction trap in Northern Ireland.
The model also considers other factors, including pyrethroid insecticide persistence and the diminishing returns associated with follow-up sprays.
For users, the tool shows when the next spray decision is needed with recommendations based on the predicted economic threshold.
The tool also predicts infection impacts for several weeks.
The AHDB says the predictions are strongest for autumn-applied sprays, especially the first spray.
The tool also indicates the urgency for decisions, including a “high urgency” notification when a spray may need be considered within a week.
