Many Welsh farmers over-reliant on subsidies, survey shows

The reliance of some Welsh farming systems on government support payments and non-farming income has been laid bare in new farm income figures.

The latest Farm Business Survey shows that for upland cattle and sheep farms the Basic Payment Scheme (BPS), other subsidies, diversified incomes, and miscellaneous income such as rents and wayleaves contributed on average about 30% to their total income (outputs) and 240% of profits in 2019-20.

This was reflected in other systems, too – income for the average hill sheep farm was £263/ha compared with £532/ha for beef, sheep and crops.

See also: Guide to funding for tree projects on farm

Survey director Tony O’Regan said this threw into doubt the survival of some farms amid imminent changes to farm support structures.

“With this level of dependency, it is difficult to see how many Welsh farms with limited options for changing farming enterprises and/or system can be profitable without relying on non-farming income and government support payments,’’ he said.

Variable results

Aberystwyth University conducted the 2019-20 survey across a random sample of just over 500 Welsh farms.

The data set out in the Farm Business Survey in Wales incomes booklet confirms significant differences between average-performing farms and those in the top third for performance.

The top-third cattle and sheep farms made more than double the profit on each effective hectare compared with the average producer, while on dairy farms the top third made a net margin of 10p/litre more than the bottom third.

Meat producers showed similar variability, with lamb production ranging from making 34p/kg to losing 90p/kg and, for beef, from plus 6p/kg to minus 121p/kg.

“None of these take into account the farmer’s labour cost, the absence of which, if misused, presents a false picture of the economics of farm production,’’ said Mr Regan.

“The dairy sector best illustrates this, since labour and pension costs alone can add more than 9p/litre, which then pushes the costs of production for the top third to 30p/litre and the bottom third closer to 37p/litre.’’

Finished cattle prices had remained low throughout the year, but store cattle prices were more variable and, depending on type, prices held up better and improved towards the end of the accounting periods.

Milk prices were more volatile and lower than the previous 12 months, with significant variability between the regions, contracts, buyers and systems. However, dairy margins overall were relatively unchanged.

How the main sectors performed in 2019-20

 

Lowland dairy farms

Hill and upland dairy farms

Upland cattle and sheep farms

Lowland cattle and sheep farms

Hill sheep farms

Hill cattle and sheep farms

Total income/ha

ÂŁ4,142

ÂŁ3,621

ÂŁ1,001

ÂŁ1,181

ÂŁ895

ÂŁ973

Total variable and fixed costs/ha

ÂŁ3,464

ÂŁ3,004

ÂŁ814

ÂŁ904

ÂŁ639

ÂŁ764

Profit after rent and finance/ha

ÂŁ471

ÂŁ426

ÂŁ119

ÂŁ170

ÂŁ214

ÂŁ146

Unpaid labour/ha

ÂŁ102

ÂŁ125

ÂŁ40

ÂŁ51

ÂŁ33

ÂŁ62

Farm costs and income

 

Top-third lowland dairy farms

Top-third hill and upland dairy farms

Top-third upland cattle and sheep farms

Top-third lowland cattle and sheep farms

Top-third hill sheep farms

Top-third hill cattle and sheep farms

Total income/ha

ÂŁ4,876

ÂŁ4,249

ÂŁ1,262

ÂŁ1,618

ÂŁ1,143

ÂŁ1,126

Total variable and fixed costs/ha

ÂŁ3,455

ÂŁ3,049

ÂŁ844

ÂŁ1,010

ÂŁ723

ÂŁ683

Profit after rent and finance/ha

ÂŁ1,263

ÂŁ1,073

ÂŁ341

ÂŁ559

ÂŁ377

ÂŁ398

Unpaid labour/ha

ÂŁ114

ÂŁ87

ÂŁ45

ÂŁ119

ÂŁ47

ÂŁ72