6 alternative bedding options to straw compared

Poor weather conditions at harvesting and diminished crop yields on the back of a dry spring, coupled with strong demand from renewable energy plants, have converged to create an unprecedented scarcity of bedding-quality straw.

British Hay and Straw Merchants Association president Mike Evison says this shortage is being made worse by the fact there’s a reluctancy to sell.

See also: Livestock farmers warned to check woodchip bedding

“No farmer will sell straw on a rising market, so there is less being released for sale,’’ he admits.

But the good news for livestock farmers is that there are many alternative options available as winter bedding. 

Dairy cow on sand

© FLPA/REX/Shutterstock

Key considerations 

Straw is a good match for deep litter beds, but sawdust and sand can be used instead, says David Ball, AHDB Dairy technical manager for dairy farm buildings.

In dairy systems, deep sand is the optimum bedding material for cubicle housing, Mr Ball suggests. It provides an ideal lying surface which is soft, comfortable and dry.

Sand can also be used effectively in deep litter yards to reduce straw use, Mr Ball recommends.

“A layer of sand beneath the straw bedding will aid drainage and keep the straw drier,” he says.

A thin scattering of straw can be carefully removed from the sand when soiled, and a fresh layer added, to keep the bed clean.

Mr Ball cautions against using recycled woodchip made from products such as fencing posts or from MDF.

“There is a risk of contamination by screws, nails and staples, even if the chip has passed through a magnetic process to remove them,” he says.

“Woodchip from MDF kitchen units or similar can create a fine dust which is not good for human health, let alone livestock health.”

Whichever bedding material is used, it requires careful management to provide optimal lying conditions, says Mr Ball.

“It is essential that surfaces are kept dry and any soiled or damp product is removed,” he says.

If using products deemed as waste, such as untreated sawdust or paper, farmers need to register for a waste exemption with the Environment Agency or the equivalent regulator in devolved administrations.

Livestock bedding alternatives compared


Prices vary between £50/t and £120/t, depending on if product is treated to prevent bacterial growth




Quantities required

Animal health and welfare considerations


Produces a comfortable, clean bed if managed carefully. Can be used for deep littering

Needs to be changed regularly because dry matter decreases when it absorbs urine


Each tonne will cover 100-120sq m at a depth of 5cm

Damp sawdust can harbour moulds

Can be spread on the land if from virgin wood


From £56/t

 Pros  Cons  Absorbency Quantities required Animal health and welfare considerations  Disposal

Can be re-used for numerous winters. Promotes high welfare and cleanliness and is readily available

Adequate dry storage required. May contain nails or staples which could cause injury if using woodchip from recycled wood products


27t will cover 800sq m at recommended 10cm depth

Bacterial growth is limited and low dust burden

Woodchip produced from virgin wood is a better fit for deep-bedded yards than cubicles

It should be below 30% moisture for maximum absorbency

Composted and screened

Composted material spread on land and screened material preserved as next year’s bedding


Approximately £40-£85/t delivered, depending on the paper product

 Pros  Cons  Absorbency Quantities required Animal health and welfare considerations  Disposal

Easy to store and reasonably easy to dispose of

Can leave bare patches on floor unless shredded into small pieces.

Must be removed once wet or sets hard

Highly absorbent if kiln dried to below 10% moisture content

Beef and sheep require a 10cm depth at start of winter. Cows need 200kg a cow each winter

Can heat up when wet and provide good conditions for pathogens to flourish

May clump and be difficult to spread; also a risk of increasing the nitrogen requirement of soils

Calcium carbonate

£53/t excluding delivery

 Pros  Cons  Absorbency Quantities required  Animal health and welfare considerations  Disposal

Doesn’t support bacterial growth so won’t contribute to the spread of bacteria

Highly alkaline and used on its own may cause scalding of teats in cows or noses in lambs and calves

Highly absorbent

500g/cubicle bed/day

Doesn’t introduce bacteria to the bed

Can be spread on fields but advisable to analyse soils first because of its alkaline nature

Crushed husks


 Pros  Cons  Absorbency Quantities required Animal health and welfare considerations  Disposal

Readily available all year round

Can be mixed with other products such as lime

Must be stored in dry conditions

Advisable to use an anti-bacterial bedding powder in conjunction with this product

6-8% moisture content

Similar quantities to sawdust

Doesn’t set hard on beds and remains free flowing for cow comfort

Biodegradable so can be spread on land


About £9/t (collected)

 Pros  Cons  Absorbency Quantities required Animal health and welfare considerations  Disposal

Produces a clean, dust-free and well-drained bed

Can be used for deep-litter beds

Can accelerate wear in slurry/muck handling equipment and concrete surfaces

0.3 litre/kg

In deep-bed systems farmers using sand report starting with an initial 20-30cm of sand and replenishing as necessary; typical use in cubicles 7.5-10kg a cow a day

Can stick to teats and udder and wear hooves

Can be spread on the land, but be aware of long-term effect on soil pH