Advertiser content

How to tackle the blackgrass burden

Provided by

Adama is a leading manufacturer and distributor of crop-protection solutions. With a heritage of nearly 70 years and over 4500 employees in more than 120 countries, Adama has world-leading expertise in a range of product categories including a full range of fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, plant growth regulators and molluscicides. Adama’s crop protection products are available in the UK through leading agro-chemical distributors and agronomy companies. Technical helpline 01635-876-622

It’s important to know your enemy

For weeds such as blackgrass, mapping plant populations and poor yield areas with a handbook or GPS will allow better targeted patch-spraying.

The latest drone technologies can also be used to map the presence and severity of weed populations, with the data produced subsequently being used to alter seeding rates and/or cultivation technique to counter the effects of weed competition.

Adama Eshot Image

Weed Mapping

Additional information regarding the use of weed mapping technologies and how they can be used on farm is available via the following links:

Royal Academy of Engineering
Farmers Weekly Interactive

The benefits of delaying drilling

The drive towards achieving higher and higher cereal yields has led to many crops being drilled earlier than they might have been as recently as 10-20 years ago.

Typical drill dates were previously into October, but as much as 50% of winter wheat has been drilled in September in recent years.

This scenario enables blackgrass populations to thrive and increase because there is no fallow period in which the first flush of weeds can be allowed to emerge and tackled with a glyphosate application.

As well as enabling the first flush of blackgrass seedlings to be destroyed, delaying drilling can also improve the efficacy of pre-emergence herbicides.

Which will be more effective when applied in damp soil conditions which are more favourable for good chemical activity.

blackgrass plants which emerge in later drilled crops also tend to be less competitive and produce fewer seeds per plant.

Time of drilling is therefore key in the fight against blackgrass: delaying drilling until as late as possible (mid-October onwards) is the main advice, but there could be a pay-off in terms of final yields.

The risk of the weather breaking and preventing late-season drilling from taking place also needs to be weighed up.

Rotational control and spring cropping

The prevalence of autumn-sown cropping is a key factor in the increase of blackgrass within the UK.

One simple way of tackling the problem is therefore to adopt a more balanced rotation through the inclusion of spring-sown crops.

Such as spring barley which is more competitive than spring wheat.

Putting a spring crop in the rotation provides the opportunity to control newly emerged plants – via mechanical or chemical means – prior to them producing seeds and ahead of the ensuing crop being drilled.

Competitive crops, or companion crops, can also be used to suppress blackgrass plants, with the AHDB citing 22-26% control.

Similarly, cover cropping or the use of grass ley breaks can also be effective at out-competing blackgrass and can reduce the blackgrass seed bank by 70-80% per year.

It is however important to remember that a one-year grass ley will rarely be long enough to reduce high blackgrass populations sufficiently.

A break of 2-3 years is therefore advisable as this could reduce the number of viable blackgrass seeds by as much as 90%.

At the end of any break period, a sufficient period of time between cultivation and sowing the next arable crop should be factored in to allow any subsequent flushes of blackgrass to be destroyed.

The latest advice from Rothamsted Research is for growers to adopt a comprehensive range of strategies to tackle back-grass for a period of at least 5 years. This “5-for-5” strategy is explained in more detail here.

Patch-spraying and rogueing

Where blackgrass populations are low, or just starting to appear, spraying off patches of infestation with glyphosate in the first week of June.

Or hand rogueing to physically remove the plants before they shed their seed are effective methods of control.

These strategies are, however, less feasible on land where extensive blackgrass populations exist.

Two farmers who are using a hand-rogueing strategy to good effect are:

Richard Hinchcliffe of Dikes Marsh Farm near Doncaster
Andrew Ward of Glebe Farm, Leadenham, Lincolnshire

Variety choice and seed rates

For blackgrass control, choosing a variety that has a more prone growth characteristic may provide some control by out-competing the emerging weeds.

Trials looking at the effect of increasing seed rates to further compete with weeds are ongoing, with many growers already adjusting seeding rates on land known to have a high blackgrass risk.

The importance of machine hygiene

Keeping tractors, sprayers and implements free of weed seeds is a very simple way of minimising the spread of weeds.

Using compressed air is an excellent way of removing lodged seed from tight spaces, while harvesting the worst-affected areas last can reduce the risk of spreading blackgrass and fungal diseases into cleaner fields.

Where there is a risk of straw or manure acting as a source of contamination, it is prudent to err on the side of caution and to minimise their use.

Iain Robertson

“I would say the easiest way is to try to plan your logistics so you do the cleanest fields first, working towards the dirtiest last to minimise transfer of seeds.

If needed, I wash off with a pressure washer (I have one on the sprayer) paying attention to the axles and any ledges that seeds may lodge on.

We also wash off drill and cultivation equipment as required. We also have leaf blowers on the machines to blow any residue off.” – Iain Robertson, Assistant Arable Manager, David Foot Ltd., Dorset

“The main source of weed movement in machinery seems to come from harvest machinery.

This means, we have become very reluctant to let harvest machinery from third parties on farm unless we know where they are coming from (i.e. non heavy weed burden farms) and that they have been properly cleaned down.

With our own machinery we clean down between fields that have a high weed burden with leaf blowers and air compressors.

One of the worst culprits are demo machines which hop from farm to farm without cleaning down all in a rush.

And every farmer thinking it is some free combining or baling and so a bargain, but in reality they then have the extra cost of dealing with weeds.

My best technique in dealing with harvest created weeds is to leave the field untouched for a minimum of 10 days.

Or ideally 14 days which allows either a chit, or for birds to eat the seeds or the seed to dry out and fail.

2017 was the first year I tried it and it was pretty successful and cheap, but plays havoc with your nerves and patience!” – Alan Clifton-Holt, Romney Marsh, Kent

Seedbed preparation and cultivation method

Research shows that residual herbicides work well against blackgrass when the seeds are located in the top 5cm of the soil.

Conversely, seeds which are buried a little deeper (typically 5-10cm) will be less susceptible to chemical control – failure to control blackgrass in shallow.

Non-inversion tillage systems can therefore result in a rapid increase in infestation.

Burying blackgrass seeds down to a depth of 15-20cm by ploughing can reduce the seeds’ viability: blackgrass seeds are relatively non-persistent, declining in viability by about 70-80% per year.

There is however is a risk that some of the remaining 20% of viable seed could be ploughed back up again later in the rotation.

The advice, therefore, is to use min-till or shallow tillage cultivation in tandem with a robust chemical control programme for at least four years, with ploughing used on a rotational basis.

Chemical control: Pre-and post-emergence treatments for maximum efficacy

Before any weed control programme is formulated. It is important to remember that,

The improper use of crop protection chemicals (too many applications, too few applications, dose rates which are too high or too low) can affect the efficacy of active ingredients, and in the worst cases, further exacerbate the rate of resistance.

Growers are therefore advised to seek professional advice before changing the accepted application protocols for any herbicide and to consider using a range of active ingredients instead of relying on just one mode of action.

The decline in recent years of achieving effective blackgrass control with post-emergence herbicides has forced growers to use ever more complex.

And expensive combinations of active ingredients, with many of these chemicals now being used at pre-emergence timings.

The need for effective pre-emergence herbicides is expressed very clearly in AHDB Information Sheet 30 (click here to download):

When selecting products to control blackgrass in winter wheat, there are a number of options to choose from.

However, looking at the effective options more closely reveals the number of active ingredients available within those products is significantly limited.

When planning the use of a pre-emergence herbicide, it is fundamentally important that the application is made at a true pre-emergence timing.

Ideally within 48 hours of drilling, and certainly not delayed until some emergence of the crop or blackgrass has begun.

In most situations, it would be unwise to apply a product with a single mode of action.

As relying on one active ingredient could not only reduce the efficacy of the overall crop protection programme, but could also make the lone active more susceptible to resistance.

Of the active ingredients currently available, and which are still capable of contributing to a successful blackgrass control programme, the most widely-used are:

  • Flufenacet (FFT)
  • Diflufenican (DFF)
  • Pendimethalin (PDM)

Each of these is available as standalone products, as well as being available in combination with other actives. Of these, the cornerstone active ingredient for pre-emergence treatments is flufenacet, typically applied at 240 gai/ha.

Flufenacet should not be exposed by applying it alone, but, instead, should be mixed with other active ingredients which have a different mode of action. Choices available, in addition to those already mentioned, include:

  • Flurtamone
  • Flupyrsulfuron
  • Picolinafen
  • Prosulfocarb
  • Triallate – this is proving to be useful, but the granular formulation (which is more effective than the liquid version) requires specialist application machinery which not all growers have access to.

Best results will be achieved when pre-emergence applications are made to fine, firm seedbeds.

In a minimum water volume of 200 litres per hectare and using a combination of forward-facing and rear-facing nozzles.

Acceptable results are possible with lower water volumes, provided good coverage of the soil surface is achieved.

In the worst blackgrass areas the herbicide programme is typically started with a pre-emergence application of 240 gai/ha flufenacet, in combination with one or more of the options mentioned above.

This can then be followed with a further 120-240 gai/ha of flufenacet at early post-emergence, again in mix with other active ingredients with activity on blackgrass.

The post-emergence application should be made when any blackgrass plants not controlled by the pre-em treatment are at the one-leaf to two-leaf stage.

Although this may not always be possible in all scenarios as an interval of six weeks is required between sequential applications of flufenacet.

In a perfect world, pre-emergence applications would be followed by enough rainfall to aid the efficacy of the active ingredients, but not so much that subsequent post-emergence treatments can’t be applied.

Unfortunately, the UK’s unpredictable and unreliable weather patterns all too often dictate that pre-emergence treatments will be followed by excessively wet or dry conditions.

In both cases, the weather will have a detrimental impact on the efficacy of the pre-emergence treatment.

Stacking and sequencing

For heavily infested soils, a peri-emergence application (when leaves are breaking the soil surface but the first leaf is not fully expanded) may also be worth considering.

A later post-emergence treatment, before the end of December, and ideally before the blackgrass plants grow beyond three true leaves, may also be needed.

In these circumstances it will be necessary to exceed 240gai/ha of FFT. However, no more than 240 gai/ha can be delivered by one product in a single application.

Different products will therefore need to be used if all applications are to be made before the end of December.

If DFF is being used, no more than 125 gai/ha should be applied in total. For PDM the limit for a single application is 1,320 gai/ha, while the maximum total dose is 2,000 gai/ha.

Products containing CTU may not be applied more than once per year on the same area of land.

Blackgrass control in a nutshell

In essence, the efficacy of a blackgrass control programme can be maximised by following these simple guidelines:

  • Use non-chemical methods in combination with herbicides to improve overall control;
  • Use a mix of active ingredients with different modes of action;
  • Apply a robust pre-emergence stack within 48 hours of drilling;
  • Ensure good application coverage by using forward and rear-facing nozzles to apply pre-emergence treatments to a fine, firm seedbed;
  • Keep the water volume up to ensure sufficient coverage;
  • Keep the sprayer’s forward operating speed reasonable: 12 km/h will ensure accurate coverage;
  • Return with a post-emergence treatment when blackgrass is at the one to two leaf stage;
  • Tailor treatments to each individual field, taking into account the soil type, rotation, previous cultivation technique and current blackgrass populations.